archives

MSM Compare Strickland's Problems to Foley's

From wcpo.com

Since the May primary, most of the charges between Ohio gubernatorial hopefuls, Republican Ken Blackwell and Democrat Ted Strickland, have been on issues.

But that changed earlier this week, when Blackwell himself leveled charges against Strickland that sound very similar to charges being made in Washington in the Mark Foley and congressional page scandal.

Ken Blackwell and Ted Strickland shook each others hands at the last gubernatorial debate in Columbus on Monday.

Though they may not have wanted to do that in light of the new allegations.

During that debate, Blackwell charged the Democratic congressman with ignoring the sex convictions of a staff member.

 

Why We Should Defund the Arts

From the Enquirer

Poet Nikki Giovanni said Tuesday that she had made it clear to organizers of Saturday's Fountain Square reopening that the version of a controversial poem she wrote for the occasion was a work in progress.

Giovanni's profanity-laced poem, in which she called Republican Ken Blackwell "a son of a bitch" and "a political whore," has created a firestorm of criticism and controversy. She delivered the poem at Saturday's celebration.

She said in a Tuesday phone interview with The Enquirer that Bill Donabedian, managing director of Fountain Square, had asked her for a few stanzas to include in a printed program for the event.

Who pays her salary?

 

Common Sense Death Penalty Thinking

From the PD

Lundgren claims that after 16 years in prison he is hypertensive, diabetic and obese and that a lethal shot would be a cruel form of punishment.

U.S. Rep. Steve LaTourette, the former county prosecutor who put Lundgren on death row and convicted most of his 10 followers in the cult, said Lundgren's efforts "to eat his way out of the death penalty were ludicrous."

"If Jeffrey Lundgren's excuse is that he is too fat to execute, perhaps we should consider executing him in the manner in which he executed his victims - with a bullet to the brain," LaTourette said.

 

Expert: Ted Strickland could be thrown out of the Governor's race

in the PD

After the county elections board deadlocked, 2-2, along party lines on whether to throw out the complaint filed by Jacquelyn Long, Lobb ruled in favor of a hearing.

The ruling by Lobb, whose boss, Republican Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, is running against Strickland for governor, brought howls of indignation from Team Strickland.

"Mr. Blackwell has once again shown his inability to keep from politicizing the Secretary of State's office," Keith Dailey, Strickland's campaign spokesman, said.

Lobb has been deputized by Blackwell to break tie votes and independently handle matters that could conflict with his gubernatorial aspirations, according to Blackwell campaign spokesman Carlo LoParo.

Under Ohio law, Blackwell's office would break tie votes at the county level on Strickland's eligibility to vote in Lisbon. So could it set up a bizarre scenario where Blackwell's office casts the deciding vote to knock his opponent off the ballot?

Long's attorney, Heather Heidelbaugh, said that if Strickland's voting residency was overturned, he would not be a "qualified elector." Only qualified electors can serve as elected officials in Ohio, although Heidelbaugh stopped short of saying that meant Strickland would be knocked off the ballot.

An Ohio State University professor who specializes in election law said it was "not likely" but "conceivable" that Strickland could be thrown out of his race against Blackwell if he is found ineligible to vote.

Why wouldn't this OSU professor go on record and use his name? My guess is that it would be Dan Tokaji, who has an entire blog about election law- But he is the only OSU election law expert I've read of. Dan is a big time liberal.

Saudis signal support for OPEC cut

From AP:

Saudis signal support for OPEC cut

By TAREK AL-ISSAWI, Associated Press Writer

Saudi Arabia's oil minister said Thursday that his country supports OPEC's proposed 1 million barrels-a-day production cut.

"We will try to make the market balanced," Ali Naimi said, ending two weeks of silence from the world's largest oil producing nation and giving a quick jolt to oil prices.

Naimi's statement came as the cartel's oil ministers gathered in the capital of Qatar for emergency talks on cutting output after a price decline of more than 25 percent since mid-July.

Saudi backing is considered to be critical among analysts who have doubted two weeks of rumors that there was consensus for an output cut within the often fractious Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. It was still unclear, however, whether the cut will be made to OPEC's official production quota of 28 million barrels a day, or to its actual output, which is believed to be slightly below that level due to slackening demand.

 

Read the rest here.

Well there you go, our chief Near East “friend” in the Global War on Islamism. We give with lives and they take our money. Wow that’s a great trade off.

In my humble opinion Saudi Arabia is a bigger enemy to Western Civilization than the Persian or Korean nutcases. Oh I ‘m sorry, I may have insulted CAIR. Well no need to worry about auto dealerships issuing Fatwa Fridays because OPEC is getting ready to issue their own "Fatwa Winter." Hit the
US during the winter with high energy prices!

I know I may be rambling like an emotional democrat blogger, but boy don’t you just get tired of getting screwed all the time by these knuckleheads? I know I sure do.

 

Hotline Blog: Ohio Republican volunteers are working hard!

from Hotline

Perhaps the biggest danger to Republicans in the wake of all these bad polls is that their volunteer base, so critical to victory in 2004, won't put their heart in their work. If volunteers become convinced that Republicans will lose control of Congress, what incentive do they have to work hard?

If you're ever read a profile of Ken Mehlman, you know he is obsessed with metrics. For him, one of the most important sources of data is a weekly e-mail his political team prepares called the "Weekly Grassroots Report." It meticulously records the work of tens of thousands of volunteers in targeted states, counties and congressional districts across the country. The data summary allows the RNC to determine which states are meeting goals and which states are falling behind.

The RNC declined to share the most recent report, which was issued Monday. But two independent sources who saw last week's report professed to be surprised: not only was their no drop off last week, 12 states broke new voter contact records.

In a month, the party completed more than a million phone calls and door contacts conbined. Bigger states are putting up big numbers -- even Ohio, which lagged behind its targets all summer, has caught up. The RNC is particularly pleased with their progress in New Jersey, where they've rapidly set up a more aggressive version of their 72 Hour Program in light of the state's more competitive Senate race.

These are the numbers that motivate Karl Rove's optimism. The spreadsheets show that Republican volunteers are working hard. There are plenty of volunteers and they seem plenty willing to knock on doors and make telephone calls. That's why it makes sense for Rove, for White House pol. dir Sara Taylor, and for Mehlman to exude uncanny optimism even while their brains pore over pessimistic polls. Right now, a strong volunteer corps on election day working to turn out voters is the only hope they've got. If the volunteers detect a shred of defeatist cross-talk or come across a newspaper article suggesting that Rove is panicked, then they'll start to panic, too.

The point is that top-level Republican optimism is pragmatic, not ignorant. [MARC AMBINDER]

Tonight, Sherrod Brown vs. Mike DeWine

From the DeWine campaign email

Tonight, Mike DeWine will debate Sherrod Brown in Toledo. Please tune in!
DATE: Thurday, October 19, 2006
TIME: 7:00pm
STATIONS: The debate will be broadcast live on ABC's WTVG Channel 13 in Toledo and on cable Channel ONN. In addition, C-SPAN will rebroadcast the debate at 11:00pm ET.

And I believe it will be on the radio in the central Ohio area and streamed online at http://610wtvn.com.

Bill Cunningham on Hannity and Colmes

Below is the transcript of WLW Cincinnati's Bill Cunningham on Fox News' Hannity and Colmes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJfa1z5-K8

HANNITY: Meanwhile sexual scandal spreading out to the Ohio gubernatorial race where democrat Ted Strickland mishandling the case of a former employee exposing himself to children. Republican candidate Ken Blackwell went as far as suggesting that strike land actually supported pedophilia by declining to vote yes on house legislation concerning adult child sex back in 1999. Joining us from the big one WLW Bill Cunningham back to talk with us. How are you?

BILL CUNNINGHAM: Sean Hannity, it's always great to be with you.

HANNITY: I will see you in Cincinnati tomorrow. Big question why don't you bring us to what's happening inside the state of Ohio because this issue is exploding.

CUNNINGHAM: As Alan Colmes may know several weeks ago information was given to me relative to the conduct of democratic congressman Ted Strickland, a few years back when he hired campaign manager gentleman who participated in behavior before school children in a school yard four to five times those were the times he was caught. When Ted Strickland was finally notified of this instead of firing the guy, what Alan Colmes good friend Ted Strickland said.

COLMES: I have never met him.

CUNNINGHAM: Keep him on the job. Alan and Sean after the election Ted Strickland flies off to the shores of Naples, Italy in order to enjoy a little fun with this 26-year-old boy toy. When this is going on, Ted Strickland and all democrats are claiming that if you knew mark Foley's situation might have known mark Foley, might have played tennis with him, resigned, Hastert, Boehner get out of office. I'm saying to Ted Strickland as is ken Blackwell as is Sean Hannity, if the same standard applies to Ted Strickland resign your democratic house seat. Quit the effort against ken Blackwell for governor and let the people have a real choice in this election.

HANNITY: Listen, Bill Cunningham, this is what's stunning about this, for 14 days in this country all we heard about was instant messages with mark
Foley, mark Foley, mark Foley, and all the indignation, shock, horror, outraged expressed by the democrat we go back and do history, jerry had sex not internet he can changes had sex with a page, he had got a standing ovation highly cold fronted committee position and loved why the democrats. We had the scandal with Bill Clinton, is he loved by the democrats. Barney Frank, loved by the Democrats. Now you are tell me here is an example far worse than what's being accused of Mark Foley, sounds to me this is the height of hypocrisy. How big an issue is this in Ohio in this important midterm election year?

CUNNINGHAM: In the Cincinnati enquirer this morning three inch headlines about Ted Strickland possibly being gay and showing bad judgment. If Ted Strickland can't run a three member office in his congressional delegation how does he run a state, the red state, Ohio, the buckeye state, the heart that beats America with 50,000 employees?

COLMES: Bill, this is really pathetic. You have a guy who is behind by double digits and out of desperation is he grasping at straws here, suggesting his opponent is gay, suggesting his opponent is a pedophile, there is absolutely no evidence of that be, and this is really sad what you and republicans in Ohio are doing out of desperation because you are going to lose a seat. It's really that they thick.

CUNNINGHAM: My friend, Alan Colmes the truth will set you free, what's good for the democrats is good for the republicans. What's good for the donkeys is good for the elephants. I would say to you Alan Colmes, if there was a republican congressman that had a campaign manager and an aid being paid for by your tax dollars performing masturbation acts in front of school kids and the congressman was notified, kept him on, promoted him and then flew off to Italy to enjoy a weekend, what would you do?

COLMES: It happened supposedly in 1994, if it happened. The person denied it happened. Compare this with the republican leadership in congress. Let me finish my point and i will give you a chance to respond. Compare this to the republican leadership in congress covering up, in fact urging mark Foley to run until he actually got caught with Ted Strickland a minister and psychologist.

CUNNINGHAM: Minister?

COLMES: Convince people he is a pedophile is beneath the dignity of somebody like you.

CUNNINGHAM: Alan comments I'm a very dignified man. Is he not a pedophile but he has a sensitive blind spot when it comes to pedophilia because he voted with barney frank in a vote that was 335 to 0 to condemn pedophilia and not to support am in blah. Ted strict la and Barney Franks said absentia present not vote.

COLMES: Because that's because there was a line that said if you were a victim of child abuse you couldn't grow up to be a normal adult. He knew that wasn't true and couldn't be his name on t you have got to put -- some of which are objectionable.

CUNNINGHAM: Alan Colmes, you may not understand sitting there in your expensive studios in New York, but Ohio.

COLMES: very expensive.

CUNNINGHAM: Ohio is not New York. Kentucky is not San Francisco. Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana is the red heart that beat America. We don't put up with this stuff in the buckeye state. Ohio State is number one in football. Sean Hannity is number one in this market. I'll telling you right now.

COLMES: I thought you were, bill.

CUNNINGHAM: Ted Strickland has a hook out of his mouth and his eye we are going to bag him in three weeks because is he a hypocrite and democrat cannot do to mark Foley without the same thing being done to Ted Strickland.

HANNITY: The truth be told, the number one guy on the radio in Cincinnati is Bill Cunningham by far.

COLMES: You are great. You are better. No, you are better.

HANNITY: I will tell you tomorrow bill Cunningham is a great day in Sean Hannity's life because I'm going to be in Cincinnati and standings side by side with you and i can't wait to see you.

COLMES: What a great love fest this is.

CUNNINGHAM: God bless you Sean Hannity and god bless America.

HANNITY: God bless America and God bless this country my friend. You don't understand what it means, Mr. Colmes, you are supporting Mr. Strickland.

McCain jokes about suicide if Democrats win Senate

From the mouth of John McCain; "I think I'd just commit suicide,"

McCain told reporters, to accompanying laughter from Republicans standing with him. "I don't want to face that eventuality because I don't think it's going to happen."

I am glad that McCain doesn’t think the Democrats will win, but if one was to group together the obstacles faced by Republicans in the last few years, John McCain would have to be at the top of the list.

Cross posted at the MVCA Commentary and Journal

 

More Bill Cunningham Audio on Ted Strickland's Pedofile Scandal

Bill Cunningham On Demand

Bill Cunningham 10/18 Hour 2
The Enquirer has finally picked up on the Ted Strickland saga. Will it make a difference? Will you still vote for him?
Bill Cunningham 10/18 Hour 3
Where is the media's coverage of the Ted Strickland/Blackwell race? Is the media trying to get you to vote for Strickland?

Blackwell v. Strickland

From opinionjournal

Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economist and longtime follower of state politics, said there's something cruelly ironic about Mr. Blackwell paying for the sins of an Ohio GOP that's lost its way. "Ken is the one good Republican in the state of Ohio," says Mr. Vedder. "He was the guy who maintained Republican principles, who wanted moderate spending growth, wanted to use budget surpluses--when we had budget surpluses--to lower taxes, wanted to move to a flat-rate income tax at a relatively low rate. This is the kind of thing Ken has been talking about for years."

Mr. Blackwell is still talking about it today, and for good reason: Ohio has lost 200,000 manufacturing jobs--a fifth of its total--in the past five years. The state's 5.7% jobless rate is more than a full percentage point above the national mean. Household incomes lag behind the rest of the country, and mortgage foreclosures continue to rise.

"Capital seeks the path of least resistance and greatest opportunity," said Mr. Blackwell, addressing a small crowd in Meigs County. "We've put too many obstacles in the way of capital investment in Ohio. We have a confiscatory tax code that needs to be changed. We have one of the toughest regulatory roads to navigate in the country."

Later on in an interview, Mr. Blackwell elaborated. And but for the fact that he is 6-foot-4, deep-voiced, bespectacled and black, you might mistake him for another Ronald Reagan. "Ask Honda why they invested in Indiana instead of Ohio," he said. "The bottom line is that it would have cost them $30 million more a year. Why? Because of escalating workers comp costs, taxes, regulatory compliance costs . . . We've got to understand what we're up against. It's easier to do business in other places."

Mr. Blackwell's economic proposals call for a large tax cut and a more level rate structure to replace the steeply graduated system that the state currently employs. Noting that Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan and Indiana all have more attractive single-rate systems, he wants to reduce Ohio's nine rates to five, and ultimately remove the lowest earners from the income tax code altogether. "This would unleash $1.2 billion back into the private sector and help jump start the economy," said Mr. Blackwell. "It would also cut taxes for 300,000 small businesses--manufacturing, retailing, farming. Most small businesses in Ohio today are limited liability or Subchapter S corporations, and they're just as impacted by cuts in the income tax system."

Meanwhile, Mr. Strickland has been as light on details as his opponent has been specific. The campaign's official slogan is "Turn Around Ohio," and the candidate has spoken in general terms about investing more in preschool programs and job training. But the congressman's real theme is the GOP's implosion, and rare is a Strickland stump speech that doesn't include mention that "we have had 16 years of this current administration that Mr. Blackwell has been part of. And what are the results? Incompetence, corruption, and in some cases, illegal behavior."

Strickland's Flip Flop

| |

Ted Strickland's Questionable 1999 Vote

Ted Strickland hasn't been telling us the truth regarding his 1999 vote in Congress. In 1999 Ted Strickland stated that there was "no right to criticize" the American Psychological Association's study condoning Child-Adult sexual relations. In 2006 he flip flopped and told us that his present vote was a result of flawed wording of the resolution, but supported condemning the study. It is interesting that the wording he takes issue with is not in the action of the resolution, but rather a fact taken from a Supreme Court case. So which Ted Strickland is telling us the truth?: The 1999 Ted Strickland supporting pedophilia or the 2006 Ted Strickland pointing to wording that is dubious relative to the action of the resolution?

We have heard a lot regarding Ted Strickland's failure to condemn sex between children and adults. Ted Strickland may have successfully dodged the issue in the primary, but he cannot escape his record today. Ted Strickland stated rationale in 2006 for voting present was the following wording he disagreed with:

“Whereas the Supreme Court has recognized that `sexually exploited children are unable to develop healthy affectionate relationships in later life, have sexual dysfunctions, and have a tendency to become sexual abusers as adults’ ”

From a Oct 16th Press Release:

"As a Minister and psychologist, Strickland said the language blamed victims and contradicted his years of training and experience which have led him to believe that the power of God can heal the suffering of innocent children. He wholeheartedly supported the remainder of the resolution."

His "wholehearted support" of the remainder of the resolution is plain false, as we will see that his speech to the house floor was in support of the APA study. However, in regards to his objection to wording of the resolution: this line was part of the whereas clauses, which give reasoning behind the resolution but are not relevant to the House's action clause which is stated as follows:

H. CON. RES. 107:

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that--
      (1) Congress condemns and denounces all suggestions in the study recently published by the American Psychological Association that indicates sexual relationships between adults and `willing' children are less harmful than believed and might even be positive for `willing' children;
      (2) Congress urges the President to likewise reject and condemn, in the strongest terms possible, any suggestion that sexual relations between children and adults--regardless of the child's frame of mind--are anything but abusive, destructive, exploitive, reprehensible, and punishable by law; and
      (3) the Congress encourages competent investigations to continue to research the effects of child sexual abuse using the best methodology so that the public and public policymakers may act upon accurate information.

The first few lines, which Strickland apparently disagreed with are rationale for the passage of the resolution itself, not what the house resolves to do!!

And it did pass. It was passed by a overwhelming margin in the house and the unanimous vote in the Senate. Later in the year Strickland criticized his fellow congressmen stating:

"Mr. Speaker, it troubles me that sometimes in this Chamber we stand and say things that we ought not to say. We criticize people that we have no right to criticize. We recently voted to condemn a scientific study and an organization, an organization that has done as much as any organization in this country to fight child abuse. I wonder how many of us read the study before we were willing to vote to say that the methodology was flawed. I wonder how many of us were technically competent to make that decision."

It is clear that Ted Strickland's stance in 1999 was that the study should have not been condemned. Ted Strickland hasn't been consistent. Maybe he regrets what he said on the house floor, but now it is record. He cannot say he was against the bill because of dubious wording, it is not true and his statements before the house prove it.

I think people are missing the point on this issue. Please bring Strickland's specious rationale to light.

Regards,

A Concerned Ohio Resident

P.S. I have included the full house resolution and his full speech to the floor of the United State Congress.

106th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. CON. RES. 107

Expressing the sense of Congress rejecting the conclusions of a recent article published by the American Psychological Association that suggests that sexual relationships between adults and children might be positive for children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 12, 1999

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. DELAY, Mr. PITTS, and Mr. WELDON of Florida) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce


CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress rejecting the conclusions of a recent article published by the American Psychological Association that suggests that sexual relationships between adults and children might be positive for children.

Whereas children are a precious gift and responsibility given to parents by God;

Whereas the spiritual, physical, and mental well-being of children is their sacred duty;

Whereas parents have the right to expect government to refrain from interfering with them in fulfilling their sacred duty and to render necessary assistance;

Whereas the United States Supreme Court has held that parents `who have this primary responsibility for children's well-being are entitled to the support of laws designed to aid discharge of that responsibility' (Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629, 639 (1968));

Whereas no segment of our society is more critical to the future of human survival and society than our children;

Whereas it is the obligation of all public policymakers not only to support but also to defend the health and rights of parents, families, and children;

Whereas information endangering children is being made public and, in some instances, may be given unwarranted or unintended credibility through release under professional titles or through professional organizations;

Whereas elected officials have a duty to inform and counter actions they consider damaging to children, parents, families, and society;

Whereas Congress has made sexual molestation and exploitation of children a felony;

Whereas all credible studies in this area, including those published by the American Psychological Association, condemn child sexual abuse as criminal and harmful to children;

Whereas the American Psychological Association has recently published a severely flawed study that suggests that sexual relationships between adults and children are less harmful than believed and might even be positive for `willing' children;

Whereas `Paidika--the Journal of Pedophilia', a publication advocating the legalization of sex with `willing' children, has published an article by one of the authors of the study, Robert Bauserman, Ph.D. (see `Man-Boy Sexual Relationships in a Cross-Cultural Perspective', Issue 5); and

Whereas the United States Supreme Court has recognized that `sexually exploited children are unable to develop healthy, affectionate relationships in later life, have sexual dysfunction, and have a tendency to become sexual abusers as adults' (New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 759, n.10 (1982)): Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that--
      (1) Congress condemns and denounces all suggestions in the study recently published by the American Psychological Association that indicates sexual relationships between adults and `willing' children are less harmful than believed and might even be positive for `willing' children;
      (2) Congress urges the President to likewise reject and condemn, in the strongest terms possible, any suggestion that sexual relations between children and adults--regardless of the child's frame of mind--are anything but abusive, destructive, exploitive, reprehensible, and punishable by law; and
      (3) the Congress encourages competent investigations to continue to research the effects of child sexual abuse using the best methodology so that the public and public policymakers may act upon accurate information.


Speech:

DO NOT VOTE TO CONDEMN UNTIL WE KNOW WHAT IT IS -- (House of Representatives - July 27, 1999)

[Page: H6431] 
GPO's PDF
---

(Mr. STRICKLAND asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. STRICKLAND. Mr. Speaker, it troubles me that sometimes in this Chamber we stand and say things that we ought not to say. We criticize people that we have no right to criticize.

We recently voted to condemn a scientific study and an organization, an organization that has done as much as any organization in this country to fight child abuse.

I wonder how many of us read the study before we were willing to vote to say that the methodology was flawed. I wonder how many of us were technically competent to make that decision.

I believe that we ought to observe the Ten Commandments. One of those Commandments says, you ought not to bear false witness against your neighbor.

When we say things about an organization or about an individual scientist that are untrue or unsubstantiated, in my judgment, we have violated that Commandment.

We ought to have the decency not to vote to condemn something until we know what it is we are voting to condemn.