6 comments:

1. Daniel, 11. August 2007, 16:07
   You’ll never win the argument this way.

    
2. VikingSpirit, 11. August 2007, 22:11
   As I always say…what is wrong with gay people, domestic partnerships, and civil unions?

    
3. CincyJeff, 12. August 2007, 17:12
   I thought it was generous of Matt to allow the Giuliani camp to spread it’s word to us, unedited. The Giuliani folks should appreciate Matt’s generosity.

    
4. Jerid, 12. August 2007, 21:02
   VS,

   I think Matt has previously articulated his position that homosexuals are sinners. I assume Matt thinks that’s primarily why they should be shunned, and not proud of their lifestyle. Matt, if you could expand or clarify on this that’d be great.

   Of course, I don’t agree with this at all.

    
5. mike pelsozy, 12. August 2007, 21:13
   jerid…when was it that you gave every that whole “i am a democrat because of my morality…i have a moral compass” bit?

   Could you elaborate more on that moral compass stuff for me? For instance, what is that defines that moral compass that you talked so much about?

   I remember asking about it…but, I never got an answer.

    
6. Mark from WMD, 13. August 2007, 12:54
   I think this entire post is tasteless. Do I agree with the homosexual lifestyle? No. Do I think they should redefine marriage? No. However, what two people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms is their own business, between them and their consciences and God. I don’t think it is right, but does that give me the right to act in such a judgemental manner as Matthew seems to be doing? No. And the comment at the bottom is just tasteless as well. With this post, Matt Naugle has fallen to the depths of Ted Rall in his assessment of Pat Tillman and the troops.