NixGuy writes about what he wanted to accomplish by supporting the Republican Party, even when candidates didn't really deserve support from conservatives:
It has long been a dream of mine that a smart Republican party could trounce the Democrats so thoroughly that key Democratic constituencies would break off and switch to the GOP and/or swing their votes as needed. Yes, I know it was a pipe dream, yet a worthy goal. The thing was, the victories of 2002 and 2004 seemed to bring the dream much closer. I figured we would need a couple more cycles to bring it home but possibly by 2010 the Democratic party could be dead.
The dream then would not be one-party rule ala the PRI in Mexico, but to break the GOP into a libertarian and a more centrist-statist party. DeWine and Voinovich would be great examples of the Centrist wing, and DeMint, Coburn, etc. would be examples of the conservative wing. The idea would be to shift the entire political debate several notches to the right.
Nixguy admits that, in retrospect, his goal was a pipe dream.
The problem I have with his goal is that the Republican "tent" can never be large enough to include many of the typical Democrat constituencies. The Democrat Party consists of many group-constituencies that like to be cradled by the government and have an insatiable appetite for expensive entitlements. The more Republicans try to attract those types of voters, the more Republicans will lose their conservative identity, and the more elections they will lose . The Republicans tried appeal to the Medicare constituency, the pro-Illegal immigrant constituency, the minimum-wage constituency, and the earmark-loving constituency, and look where they ended up this month. Oops.
And what is sad, is that when a principled Reagan-Republican like Ken Blackwell comes along, his message can be completely drowned out when his party loses its way. As I know first hand, it is VERY difficult to sell a staunch "anti-tax, anti-big government" message to voters when you are in the same party that RAISED taxes and GREW the size of government.
Nixguy also offers some good advice for Republican candidates:
1. Be a conservative“in the gut.” Everyone knows how to sound like a conservative and push the right talking points. But are you“one of us”? Pretenders can be hard to find out, but there are“tells”. One of the biggest is stance on earmarks and spending. Talking like a conservative, but“bringing home the bacon” means you don’t meet qualification #1.
2. Excellent public speaking ability. This goes along with #1 but because conservatism is hated by the media and elites, you should be very, very good at getting your message out, for it will be distorted.
3. Smart ability to focus on right issues at right time. Tom Brinkman is a good example of this. I believe he meets qual #1 and possibly #2 although I’ve never heard him speak. But he has this habit of introducing social issue legislation that hasn’t a chance in heck of going anywhere. It all ends up being a useless waste of time. Note to conservatives. Be Effective. Look at Reagan’s record while governor of California if you want a clue on how to do this.
Russell Hughlock (who is still a subject of the Queen, by the way), in attacking Nixguy's shattered Machiavellian dreams, writes the following:
What (Nixguy) and many others really miss is that it is the ideas that should be supported and followed, not the personalities or parties behind them. No one party or person has ever had the monopoly on good ideas, and none ever will.
Ideas over personalities? Oh yeah, thats why Barack "Osama" Obama is going to probably be the Democrat nominee for President. (Russell, remember when Obama came to Ohio to speak at a Democrat dinner? Ohio's liberal bloggers fawned over him like a bunch of hormonal teenage girls at a Justin Timberlake concert.)
And in all seriousness, I'm tired of government having "good ideas." I wish they would just stop it. As President Reagan said, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." At this point, I want government to have fewer "good ideas" and more gridlock.