Gosh, I thought John Wolfe was dead, and The Dispatch, a former Republican-establishment newspaper, already morphed into the type of liberal rag that the other Ohio newspapers already were?
Well, maybe I’m overreacting. But how could anyone read today’s article from Jim Siegel, and not think Jim is trying to make the establishment Republicans in the Ohio legislature look better than they actually are?:
Since the mid-1990s, the selection of a House speaker was strictly up to Republican legislators. But after a seven-seat pickup in 2006 reduced the margin to 53-46, Democrats say they can take over in 2008.
It would be a historic victory. Since the state created the current 99-member House in 1967, no party that did not draw the district boundaries has taken control of the chamber. Republicans last drew the lines after the 2000 census and are confident of a continued majority.
Leadership battles could interrupt election plans for both parties, potentially dividing money or leading to costly primary elections.
Rep. Mark Wagoner, a 35-year-old Toledo lawyer in his second term, is viewed as the top contender to replace Speaker Jon A. Husted in 2009 if the House remains in GOP hands. Husted, of Kettering, must leave because he will hit the eight-year maximum under Ohio term limits.
But before Wagoner got his first diaper change, Rep. William G. Batchelder’s 30-year legislative career was under way, and he wants the job, too. When the Medina Republican, who served in the House from 1968 to ‘98, returned this year after eight years as a county judge, he brought unmatched experience and a strong desire to claim the speaker’s chair that eluded him in the past.
“It’s very difficult, I think, for people who don’t have a lot of experience to anticipate some of the things that you will face,” Batchelder said.
Wagoner has built a solid team to help him: Reps. Matthew J. Dolan of Novelty, Bill Coley of West Chester, Jay Hottinger of Newark, Christopher R. Widener of Springfield and Ross McGregor of Springfield. Each gave at least $100,000 to the House Republican Caucus in the previous election cycle.
“We’ve been trying all along to sell the team concept,” Wagoner said. Batchelder “is running more of a statewide campaign about him.”
Wagoner already has given $150,000 to the caucus this year. Batchelder’s total is not expected to come close.
Batchelder, 64, said he understands that some see him as the underdog. But he notes that because of term limits and other maneuvering, the caucus will have more than 20 new members in 2009, and he plans to help get them elected.
Now, what Jim Siegel said isn’t entirely incorrect. Batchelder, even with his vast experience, is the underdog.
But, there are two points that I have problems with.
The first one is when he said that Wagoner has Christopher Widner on his team. How does Widner’s support help Wagoner, if Widner has already announced he is running for State Senate? Chris has one foot out the door, and he is probably much more concerned about the Senate Republican caucus and his race.
And the second, and much more important point is, as I have pointed out before, Wagoner is far from the fundraising power house that Jim Siegel and others likes to paint him as. As this document shows, Wagoner may have given $150,000 just 30 DAYS AGO to the caucus, but the Ohio GOP and the caucus have also contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars BACK to Wagoner’s campaign. So even with this major $150,000 donation, Wagoner’s net contribution to the caucus is a paltry $3, 716. And Wagoner is in a solidly Republican district!
But Batchelder, on the other hand, is in a tougher district- and the caucus and the Ohio GOP has donated zero, zip, squat to his campaign. And Batchelder’s net contributions to the caucus is $27,500, plus he personally donated $8,000 to the Ohio GOP! That also isn’t a ton of money, but thats much better than Wagoner- As Wagoner is clearly is an embarrassingly awful fundraiser and is being propped up by his Republican establishment friends. Batchelder doesn’t have that sort of luxury.
So why did Jim Siegel focus on contributions to the caucus, but ignored the money coming out of the caucus? Wouldn’t that change the entire premise of his article, and show that Batchelder is a solid candidate who could seriously become speaker, even though the Republican establishment is against him?
As Franklin County GOP Doug Priesse said, Batchelder has “more legislative history in his little pinky, and he’s got a mind like a steel trap.” And if Wagoner wants to defeat Bill, he might want to stop spending so much time in smoky rooms with Husted and Dolan, and learn how to fundraise.